Posted by: jerryhusak | June 11, 2013

More than one way to modify a fly wing

There’s more than one way to skin a cat, as the saying goes. Although this euphemism is a tired cliché, it applies to how morphological traits may evolve. To solve a functional ‘problem’, species may evolve different morphological means to reach the same functional end. This is called “many-to-one mapping” in evolutionary biology. My colleagues and I studied how a fascinating group of insects, stalk-eyed flies, might morphologically overcome impaired flight brought about by their ridiculously exaggerated eye stalks, the span of which can be longer than the fly’s body itself!

ImageOne of the more dimorphic species, showing the extreme differences between males and females in eye span. Yes, the eyes are on the tips of those stalks!

Male stalk-eyed flies use their eye stalks to size up other males during fights and to attract potential mates. This advantage of having long eye stalks has resulted in the evolution of a very elongated ornament. The problem is, the long eye stalks mess up the physics of flight for the males, making the energy required to turn in flight much higher.  However, to counter this problem, male stalk-eyed flies have evolved changes in their wings to compensate for their potentially reduced flight performance. They have longer wings, and differently shaped wings compared to females and males of species without elongated eye stalks. Our recent study shows that different groups of stalk-eyed flies have modified their wings over evolutionary time via different means to reach the same end of compensating for the long eye stalks. Such many-to-one mapping of morphology is probably much more common in nature than we realize, and our study emphasizes that it can apply to a diversity of evolutionary scenarios.

 Image Thin-plate spline deformation grids of males within each genus, showing how wing shape would have to be warped from species monomorphic for eye span to make wings for species dimorphic for eye span.

 The take-home message from this research, and other work like it, is that phenotypes change over evolutionary time via modifications of different combinations of pieces in different groups.  That is, A and B might change in one group, whereas A and C might change in another, but with the same functional endpoint in both. Such is the subtlety and beauty of natural selection.

About these ads

Responses

  1. […] Husak, J. F., Ribak G., Baker R.H., Wilkinson G.S., Swallow J.G. (2013) Effects of ornamentation and phylogeny on wing shape evolution in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26:1281-1293. (general audience summary) […]

  2. I would be very grateful if you could tell me how to reference the photo you used for perfectly presenting sexual dimorphism in T.breviscopium. Thanks

  3. […] the evolution of different mechanisms. This is a phenomenon that functional morphologists call “many-to-one mapping.” The idea is that the same functional end can be reached by multiple mechanistic means. It seems […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: